In November 1498 he undertook his first diplomatic assignment, which involved a brief trip to the city of Piombino. Machiavelli wrote The Prince to serve as a handbook for rulers, and he claims explicitly throughout the work that he is not interested in talking about ideal republics or imaginary utopias, as many of his predecessors had done: There is such a gap between how one lives and how one should live that he who neglects what is being done for what should be done will learn his destruction rather than his preservation.. Much of Machiavellis important personal correspondence has been collected in Atkinson and Sices (1996). F. AITH. As with history, the word necessity has no univocal meaning in Machiavellis writings. However, by his mid-twenties he had conducted major military reforms. Nor does the content settle the issue; the chapter titles are in Latin but the body of each chapter is in Italian, and the words prince and principality occur frequently throughout the entire book. One of the ironies surrounding Machiavelli is that there has never been anything resembling a Machiavellian school of thought. Some commentators believe that effects are only effects if they are seen or displayed. Its enduring value in my view lies not so much in its political theories as in the way it discloses or articulates a particular way of looking at the world. A third candidate might be any of the various and so-called Averroist ideas, many of which underwent a revival in Machiavellis day (especially in places like Padua). They do typically argue that The Prince presents a different teaching than does the Discourses; and that, as an earlier work, The Prince is not as comprehensive or mature of a writing as the Discourses. Plebeians, who did not possess as much wealth or family heritage as patricians, could still attain prominence in the Roman Republic by acquiring glory in speeches (e.g., Cicero) or through deeds, especially in wartime (e.g., Gaius Marius). Books 3 and 4 concern issues regarding battle, such as tactics and formation. In particular, Mansfield draws out the world-historical significance of Machiavelli's discovery or invention of the effectual truth and shows why Machiavelli can justly be called the founder of modernity. Advice like this, offered by Niccol Machiavelli in The Prince, made its author's name synonymous with the ruthless use of power. The sketcher image becomes even more complicated later in the text, when Machiavelli introduces the perspectives of two additional humors of the city, that is, the great (i grandi; P 9) and the soldiers (i soldati; P 19). Furthermore, it is a flexibility that exists within prudently ascertained parameters and for which we are responsible. In August 1501 he was married to Marietta di Ludovico Corsini. Although the effectual truth may pertain to military matters (e.g., P 14 and P 17), it is comprehensive in that it treats all the things of the world and not just military things (P 18). While we should often imitate those greater than us (P 6), we should also learn how to imitate those lesser than us. One such character is Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester. One of the clearest examples is Pope Alexander VI, a particularly adroit liar (P 18). Although many aspects of Machiavellis account of the humors are well understood, some remain mysterious. In other places, he gestures toward the cyclical account, such as his approximation of the Polybian cycle of regimes (D 1.2) or his suggestion that human events repeat themselves (FH 5.1; compare D 2.5). Friends such as Francesco Guicciardini and patrons such as Lorenzo di Filippo Strozzi attempted, with varying degrees of success, to restore Machiavellis reputation with the Medici. Machiavelli regularly encourages (or at least appears to encourage) his readers to imitate figures such as Cesare Borgia (P 7 and P 13) or Caesar (P 14), as well as certain models (e.g., D 3.33) and the virtue of the past in general (D 2.pr). Only a few months before, he had found himself in mortal danger, on the sharp end of the power he so brilliantly analysed. During this period, Cesare Borgia became the Duke of Valentinois in the late summer of 1498. Human life is thus restless motion (D 1.6 and 2.pr), resulting in clashes in the struggle to satisfy ones desires. For example, Agathocles is characterized by inhumanity (inumanit; P8), and Hannibal was inhumanely cruel (inumana crudelt; P 17; see also D 3.21-22). Machiavelli says that the city or state is always minimally composed of the humors of the people and the great (P 9 and 19; D 1.4; FH 2.12 and 3.1, but contrast FH 8.19); in some polities, for reasons not entirely clear, the soldiers count as a humor (P 19). Machiavellis fortunes did not change drastically at first. Prior to Machiavelli, works in this genre advised princes to adopt the best prince as their model, but Machiavelli's version recommends that a prince go to the "effectual truth" of things and forgo the standard of "what should be done" lest he bring about his ruin. 251 The intervention of Cardinal Giulio de Medici was key; the Histories would be dedicated to him and presented to him in 1525, by which time he had ascended to the papacy as Clement VII. Two Versions of Political Philosophy: Teleology and the Conceptual Genesis of the Modern State. In, Spackman, Barbara. 2015] B. REAKING . . Machiavelli for instance decries the imitation of bad models in these corrupt centuries of ours (D 2.19); and some scholars believe that his recommendations regarding Cesare Borgia and Caesar in particular are attenuated and even completely subverted in the final analysis. Machiavellis writings bear the imprint of his age in this regard. Law and Innovation in Machiavellis, Tarcov, Nathan. In late 1512, Machiavelli was accused of participating in an anti-Medici conspiracy. It also made belief in the afterlife mandatory. He wrote a play called Le Maschere (The Masks) which was inspired by Aristophanes Clouds but which has not survived. Patricide and the Plot of, Skinner, Quentin. By his mid-thirties, he had defeated no less a general than Hannibal, the most dangerous enemy the Romans ever faced and the master [or teacher] of war (maestro di guerra; D 3.10). Another way to put this point is to say that the effect (effetto) of the effectual truth is always the effect on some observer. Power, Virt, and Fortune. 77,943. downloads. For if human actions imitate nature, then it is reasonable to believe that Machiavellis account of human nature would gesture toward his account of the cosmos. Among other things, Machiavelli wrote on how Duke Valentino killed Vitellozzo Vitelli (compare P 7); on how Florence tried to suppress the factions in Pistoia (compare P 17); and how to deal with the rebels of Valdichiana. Machiavelli rejected "the [Aristotelian] principle that a thing should be defined by its excellence," instead "demanding the 'effectual truth,' in which a thing is defined by its upshot or outcome"). In a given situation, will generosity strengthen the princes position? Mercer University With respect to self-assertion, those with virtue are dynamic and restless, even relentless. Some scholars focus on possible origins of this idea (e.g., medieval medicine or cosmology), whereas others focus on the fact that the humors are rooted in desire. It was probably written in the early 1520s. In Book 1, Machiavelli explores how Italy has become disunited, in no small part due to causes such as Christianity (FH 1.5) and barbarian invasions (FH 1.9). What matters in politics is how we appear to othershow we are held (tenuto) by others. His philosophical legacy remains enigmatic, but that result should not be surprising for a thinker who understood the necessity to work sometimes from the shadows. Required fields are marked *. Machiavelli human nature. Is Machiavelli a philosopher? Why Machiavelli Still Matters. The fact that seeming vices can be used well and that seeming virtues can be used poorly suggests that there is an instrumentality to Machiavellian ethics that goes beyond the traditional account of the virtues. We possess no surviving manuscript copy of it in Machiavellis own handwriting. Discord, rather than concord, is thus the basis for the state. In March 1499, he was sent to Pontedera to negotiate a pay dispute involving the mercenary captain, Jacopo dAppiano. Regarding Machiavellis poetry and plays, see Ascoli and Capodivacca (2010), Martinez (2010), Kahn (2010 and 1994), Atkinson and Sices (2007 [1985]), Patapan (2003), Sullivan (2000), and Ascoli and Kahn (1993). Lionizing Machiavelli., Lukes, Timothy J. One event that would have a deep impact on Machiavellis ideas was the means by which Borgia reversed a period of bad fortune. Machiavelli compares the Pope with the Ottoman Turk and the Egyptian Sultan (P 19; compare P 11). It holds that Machiavelli is something of a neo-Roman republican. Not long after Savonarola was put to death, Machiavelli was appointed to serve under Adriani as head of the Second Chancery. It contains many typical Machiavellian themes, the most notable of which are conspiracy and the use of religion as a mask for immoral purposes. Savonarola convinces the Florentines, no nave people, that he talks with God (D 1.11); helps to reorder Florence but loses reputation after he fails to uphold a law that he fiercely supported (D 1.45); foretells the coming of Charles VIII into Florence (D 1.56); and understands what Moses understands, which is that one must kill envious men who oppose ones plans (D 3.30). One way to address this question is to begin with Chapter 15 of The Prince, where Machiavelli introduces the term. He is mentioned at least five times in The Prince (P 6 [4x] and 26) and at least five times in the Discourses (D 1.1, 1.9, 2.8 [2x], and 3.30). If we look at the symbolism of the ministers punishment, we find that the spectacle is brilliantly staged. But usually he speaks only of two forms, the principality and the republic (P 1). An alternative hypothesis is that Machiavelli has some literary or philosophical reason to break from the structure of the outline, keeping with his general trajectory of departing from what is customary. Their philosophical engagement occurred primarily through correspondence, however, and in the major works Machiavelli does not substantively take up Guicciardinis thought. It goes without saying that there are many important books that are not mentioned. Firstly, it is distinguished from what is imagined, particularly imagined republics and principalities (incidentally, this passage is the last explicit mention of a republic in the book). He strongly promoted a secular society and felt morality was not necessary but stood . Conveniente is variously rendered by translators as fitting, convenient, suitable, appropriate, proper, and the like (compare Romulus opportunity in P 6). At times, it seems related to instability, as when he says that the nature of peoples is variable (P 6); that it is possible to change ones nature with the times (P 25; D 1.40, 1.41, 1.58, 2.3, and 3.39); that worldly things by nature are variable and always in motion (P 10 and FH 5.1; compare P 25); that human things are always in motion (D 1.6 and 2.pr); and that all things are of finite duration (D 3.1). Some scholars have emphasized the various places where Machiavelli associates Christianity with the use of dissimulation (e.g., P 18) and fear (e.g., D 3.1) as a form of social control. Figures as great as Moses, Romulus, Cyrus, and Theseus are no exception (P 6), nor is the quasi-mythical redeemer whom Machiavelli summons in order to save Italy (P 26). Scholars have long focused upon how Machiavelli thought Florence was wretched, especially when compared to ancient Rome. Consequently, his imitation was incentivized, which partly led to the rise of the warlordssuch as Pompey and Julius Caesarand the eventual end of the Republic. The most one can say about The Prince in this regard is that Kissinger and Nixon preferred it as their bedtime reading. Xenophons Cyrus is chaste, affable, humane, and liberal (P 14). 275 Copy quote. No one can escape the necessity of having to have money with which to buy food, . Some fatality of fortune will always win out over the shrewd, efficacious strategies of this sort of virt. For Lucretius, the soul is material, perishable, and made up of two parts: animus, which is located in the chest, and anima, which is spread throughout the body. Najemy has examined Machiavellis correspondence with Vettori (1993). Colonna was a mercenary captainnotable enough, given Machiavellis insistent warnings against mercenary arms (e.g., P 12-13 and D 1.43). Similarly, humanity (umanit) is named as a trait that one may have to disavow in times of necessity (P 18). The most notable member of this camp is Claude Lefort (2012 [1972]). But in fact it is replete with recommendations of moderation and self-discipline. The Discourses is, by Machiavellis admission, ostensibly a commentary on Livys history. Life, Positive, Birthday. In the Discourses, Moses is a lawgiver who is compelled to kill infinite men due to their envy and in order to push his laws and orders forward (D 3.30; see also Exodus 32:25-28). However, it should be noted that recent work has suggested that many, if not all, of Machiavellis shocking moral claims are ironic. According to Max Lerner, Machiavelli's The Prince recognized the importance of politics and "subjected it to scientific study" (5). Remember, Machiavelli says, I would not know of any better precept to give a new prince than the example of his action. And yet if you read chapter seven of The Prince carefully, you will find that Borgia was ultimately defeated by the great antagonist of virtue, namely fortune. U. S. A. Species of sects tend to be distinguished by their adversarial character, such as Catholic versus heretical (FH 1.5); Christian versus Gentile (D 2.2); and Guelf versus Ghibelline (P 20). Of all the things he must guard against, hatred and contempt come first, and liberality leads to both. Possible Philosophical Influences on Machiavelli, Althusser, Louis. Time sweeps everything before it and brings the good as well as the bad (P 3); fortune varies and can ruin those who are obstinate (P 25). At a stroke (ad un tratto) and without any respect (sanza alcuno rispetto) are two characteristic examples that Machiavelli frequently deploys. Books 3 and 4 are especially notable for Machiavellis analysis of the class conflicts that exist in every polity (e.g., FH 3.1), and some scholars believe that his treatment here is more developed and nuanced than his accounts in either The Prince or the Discourses. Immediately after praising Xenophons account of Cyrus at the end of Prince 14, Machiavelli in Prince 15 lambasts those who have presented imaginary objects of imitation. Piero is highlighted mainly for lacking the foresight and prudence of his father; for fomenting popular resentment; and for being unable to resist the ambition of the great. Other good places to begin are Nederman (2009), Viroli (1998), Mansfield (2017, 2016, and 1998), Skinner (2017 and 1978), Prezzolini (1967), Voegelin (1951), and Foster (1941). Maurizio Viroli (2016, 2014, 2010, 2000, and 1998) could also be reasonably placed here, though he puts additional emphasis on The Prince. Some scholars believe that Machiavelli critiques both Plato and Renaissance Platonism in such passages. In canto 28 of Dantes Inferno, the so-called sowers of discord are punished in Hell by dismemberment. There are few, if any, doctrines that all Platonists have held, as Plato himself did not insist upon the dogmatic character of either his writings or his oral teaching. Machiavelli refers simply to Discorsi in the Dedicatory Letter to the work, however, and it is not clear whether he intended the title to specifically pick out the first ten books by name. Like many other authors in the republican tradition, he frequently ponders the problem of corruption (e.g., D 1.17, 1. All historians know is that soon after Savonarolas demise, Machiavelli, then age 29, emerged to become head of Florences second chancery. He also distinguishes between the humors of the great and the people (D 1.4-5; P 9). War and Foreign Affairs in Machiavellis, Lynch, Christopher. Lefort (2012) and Strauss (1958) are daunting and difficult but also well worth the attempt. Machiavellis nephew, Giuliano de Ricci, is responsible for assembling the copies of letters that Machiavelli had made. Among Machiavellis favorite Italian authors were Dante and Petrarch. That title did not appear until roughly five years after Machiavellis death, when the first edition of the book was published with papal privilege in 1532. Regarding Lucretius, see A. Palmer (2014), Brown (2010a and 2010b), and Rahe (2008). The great antagonist of virt is fortuna, which we must understand as temporal instabilitythe flux and contingency of temporal events. It is worth noting in passing that we possess autograph copies of two of Strozzis works in Machiavellis hand (Commedia and Pistola). Finally Ive found somethung whichh helpd who filled the hungry with good things and sent the rich away empty (D 1.26; Luke 1:53; compare I Samuel 2:5-7). The most notable recent member of this camp is Erica Benner (2017a, 2017b, 2013, and 2009), who argues that The Prince is thoroughly ironic and that Machiavelli presents a shocking moral teaching in order to subvert it. But this subject matter appears to be exhausted as early as Chapter 7. It is better for a prince to be feared than loved, because love is fickle, while fear is constant. With respect to Machiavelli, Lucretius was an important influence on Bartolomeo Scala, a lawyer who was a friend of Machiavellis father. Which title did Machiavelli intend: the Latin title of De Principatibus (Of Principalities); or the Italian title of Il Principe (The Prince)? Machiavelli was the first theorist to decisively divorce politics from ethics, and hence to give a certain autonomy to the study of politics. Although what follows are stylized and compressed glosses of complicated interpretations, they may serve as profitable beginning points for a reader interested in pursuing the issue further. To see how Machiavelli discovered fact, we may return to his effectual truth of the thing in the paragraph ofThe Prince being featured. Aristotelian political form is something like a lens through which the people understand themselves. Machiavellis Prince: Background and Formation., Warner, John M., and John T. Scott. Ancient philosophy, literature, and history were regularly discussed there, in addition to contemporary works on occasion (for example, some of Machiavellis Discourses on Livy). He laments the idleness of modern times (D 1.pr; see also FH 5.1) and encourages potential founders to ponder the wisdom of choosing a site that would force its inhabitants to work hard in order to survive (D 1.1). It is worth remembering that the humanists of Machiavellis day were almost exclusively professional rhetoricians. Machiavelli died on June 21, 1527. Norbrook, David, Stephen Harrison, and Philip Hardie, eds. In the preface to the first book, Machiavelli laments the fact that there is no longer a true knowledge of histories (vera cognizione delle storie) and judges it necessary to write upon the books of Livy that have not been intercepted by the malignity of the times (la malignit de tempi). However, it should be noted that recent work has called into question whether these recommendations are sincere. But how we appear depends upon what we do and where we place ourselves in order to do it. Our religion is also contrasted to the curiously singular ancient religion (religione antica; D 2.2). The suggestion seems to be that Machiavelli throughout the text variously speaks to one or the other of these vantage points and perhaps even variously speaks from one or the other of these vantage points. He also names Cyrusor least Xenophons version of Cyrus (D 3.22)as the exemplar that Scipio Africanus imitates (P 14). Over the next decade, he would undertake many other missions, some of which kept him away from home for months (e.g., his 1507 mission to Germany). Both the Blado and Giunta texts give the title of Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio. But Cicero is never named in The Prince (although Machiavelli does allude to him via the images of the fox and the lion in P 18-19) and is named only three times in the Discourses (D 1.4, 1.33, and 1.52; see also D 1.28, 1.56, and 1.59). Evidence suggests that other manuscript copies were circulating among Machiavellis friends, and perhaps beyond, by 1516-17. However, it is a strange kind of commentary: one in which Machiavelli regularly alters or omits Livys words (e.g., D 1.12) and in which he disagrees with Livy outright (e.g., D 1.58). The reference is to Livys History of Rome (Ab Urbe Condita) and more specifically to its first ten books. "But since my intention is to write something useful for anyone who understands it, it seemed more suitable for me to search after the effectual truth of the matter rather than its imagined one. Soderini (e.g., D 1.7, 1.52, 1.56, 3.3, 3.9, and 3.30) allowed Machiavelli to create a Florentine militia in 1505-1506. All rights reserved. Secondly, Machiavelli says that fortune allows herself to be won more by the impetuous than by those who proceed in a cold or cautious manner. The place of religion in Machiavellis thought remains one of the most contentious questions in the scholarship. In Chapter 12, Machiavelli says that he has previously treated the acquisition and maintenance of principalities and says that the remaining task is to discourse generally on offensive and defensive matters. The question of authorial voice is also important. The Riddle of Cesare Borgia and the Legacy of Machiavellis, Orwin, Clifford. Members of this camp typically argue that Machiavelli is a republican of various sorts and place special emphasis upon his rhetoric. It is all the more striking to readers today, then, when they confront Machiavellis seeming recommendations of cruelty. He also began to write the Discourses on Livy during this period. And as the humors clash, they generate various political effects (P 9)these are sometimes good (e.g., liberty; D 1.4) and sometimes bad (e.g., license; P 17 and D 1.7, 1.37, 3.4 and 3.27; FH 4.1). Rousseau and Spinoza in their own respective ways also seemed to hold this interpretation. Machiavelli's View Of Human Nature 2022-11-14. . The Medici coat of arms can be seen all over the buildings of Florence. An . It has long been noted that Machiavellis ordering of these events does not follow the order given in Exodus (14:21, 13:21, 17:6, and 16:4, respectively). Evidence suggests that manuscript copies were circulating by 1530 and perhaps earlier. Five centuries ago, Niccol Machiavelli called this the "effectual truth": Claims that are true, he wrote in "The Prince," are so not because they correspond to objective reality but . Scholars thus remain divided on this question. This linguistic proximity might mean various things: that virtue and fortune are not as opposed as they first appear; that a virtuous prince might share (or imitate) some of fortunes qualities; or that a virtuous prince, in controlling fortune, takes over its role. The Prince shows us what the world looks like when viewed from a strictly demoralized perspective. In 1502 Cesare Borgia lured rivals to the fortress of Senigallia on Italys Adriatic coast, where he ordered them killed. Some examples include Benner (2017a), Celenza (2015), Black (2013 and 2010), Atkinson (2010), Skinner (2010), Viroli (2010, 2000, and 1998), de Grazia (1989), and Ridolfi (1964). Yale Insights is produced by the Yale School of Management. The Redeeming Prince. In, Voegelin, Eric. Scholars are divided on this issue. Suffice it to say that he was the natural, or illegitimate, son of Pope Alexander VI, who helped Borgia put together an army and conquer the region of Romagna, in central Italy. And he suggests that a prince should be a broad questioner (largo domandatore) and a patient listener to the truth (paziente auditore del vero; P 23). History (istoria / storia) and necessity (necessit) are two important terms for Machiavelli that remain particularly obscure. At first glance, it is not clear whether the teaching of the Discourses complements that of The Prince or whether it militates against it. If the truth be told, this strange little treatise for which Machiavelli is famous, or infamous, never aidedat least not in any systematic wayanyone in the actual business of governing. These two works, along with other snippets of Epicurean philosophy already known from Seneca and Cicero, inspired many thinkerssuch as Ficino and Albertito ponder the return of these ideas. Furthermore, Machiavelli does attribute certain qualities to those who live in republicsgreater hatred, greater desire for revenge, and restlessness born from the memory of their previous libertywhich might be absent in those who live in principalities (P 4-5; D 1.16-19 and 2.2; FH 4.1). Could it be that Machiavelli puts Xenophons Cyrus forward as an example that is not to be followed? Between 1510 and 1515, Machiavelli wrote several sonnets and at least one serenade. He further distinguishes between things done by private and public counsel. Machiavelli's ideal paradigm for governing is to be understood amidst the subtle intersections between the 'effectual truth' of politics as both the art and science of leadership self-preservation and the mastery of 'fortune' with action Journal of International Relations and Development Volume 8, Number 3, 2005 264 to be justified by the overriding criteria of necessity. As with the question concerning Plato, the question of whether Aristotle influenced Machiavelli would seem to depend at least in part on the Aristotelianism to which he was exposed. At least once Machiavelli speaks of natural things (cose della natura; P 7); at least twice he associates nature with God (via spokesmen; see FH 3.13 and 4.16). Corruption is associated with the desire to dominate others. The rise of Charlemagne is also a crucial factor (FH 1.11). I Capitoli contains tercets which are dedicated to friends and which treat the topics of ingratitude, fortune, ambition, and opportunity (with virtue being notably absent). Summary Chapter XVI: Liberality and Parsimony. Adriani deployed Lucretius in his Florentine lectures on poetry and rhetoric between 1494 and 1515. Given his stated intention there to write something useful for whoever understands it, Machiavelli claims that it is more conveniente to go after the effectual truth than the imagination of things that have never been seen or known to be in truth (vero essere; compare FH 8.29). Hardcover. Machiavellis annotations focus on the passages in De rerum natura which concern Epicurean physicsthat is, the way that the cosmos would function in terms of atomic motion, atomic swerve, free will, and a lack of providential intervention. The close examination of Strauss's critical study of Machiavelli's teaching in Parts Two and Three shows that Strauss . Quentin Skinners Method and Machiavellis, Vatter, Miguel. Introduction. Here is an extract fromThe New Criterions post: To see how important Machiavelli was one must first examine how important he meant to be. Frances self-destructive attempt to claim the Kingdom of Naples in the late 1400s attracted the emerging power of Spain and the old power of the Holy Roman Empire. But it is worth noting that Machiavelli does not claim that it is possible to hold fortune down at all; he instead simply remarks upon what would be necessary if one had the desire to do so. On May 23, 1498, almost exactly a year later, he was hung and then burned at the stake with two other friars in the Piazza della Signoria. As with The Prince, there is a bit of mystery surrounding the title of the Discourses. Niccolo Machiavelli. The answer, I think, has to do with the fact that this book is what we call a classic. Machiavelli does indeed implicate two other friars: Ponzo for insanity and Alberto for hypocrisy. Lets take a step back. Some scholars believe that Machiavellis account is also beholden to the various Renaissance lives of Tamerlanefor instance, those by Poggio Bracciolini and especially Enea Silvio Piccolomini, who would become Pope Pius II and whose account became something of a genre model. Let me begin with a simple question: Why are we still reading this book called The Prince, which was written 500 years ago? And he suggests that there are rules which never, or rarely, fail (e.g., P 3)that is, rules which admit the possibility of failure and which are thus not strictly necessary. But here is where things start to get complicated. This might hold true whether they are actual rulers (e.g., a certain prince of present times who says one thing and does another; P 18) or whether they are historical examples (e.g., Machiavellis altered story of David; P 13). In 1512 Julius helped return power to the Medici in Florence. Liberality is characterized as a virtue that consumes itself and thus cannot be maintainedunless one spends what belongs to others, as did Cyrus, Caesar, and Alexander (P 17). In this way, Machiavelli is perhaps the forerunner of various modern accounts of substance (e.g., that of Descartes) that characterize the reality of a thing in terms of its independence rather than its goodness.
How Are Lion Cubs Raised Within The Pride,
Nicknames For Ray,
Articles M
